ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Oral soft tissue diagnosis as a novel teledentistry framework for the post-pandemic era: A systematic review.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Teledentistry has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional care. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of teledentistry in diagnosing and managing oral soft tissue diseases compared to traditional consultations, explores clinical outcomes, technological challenges, and implications for future research and policy, and digitally advanced countries. Materials and methods: A review registered in Prospero with CRD42024626432 used CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect databases following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligibility was based on population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design (PICOS) with inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on rural populations, teledentistry interventions for oral soft tissue conditions, comparative models, and clinical outcomes. Bias risk was assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool for Nonrandomized Studies. Results: Fourteen eligible studies were included. Most demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy of oral soft tissue lesions, patient satisfaction, and follow-up compliance in teledentistry-supported care. Modern platform diagnostics were commonly used. The comparative analyses showed that teledentistry was at least equivalent to traditional consultations. Conclusion: Teledentistry shows strong potential as a cost-effective, accessible solution for managing oral soft tissue conditions. Its integration into mainstream healthcare could bridge disparities in oral health service delivery in underserved regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.