ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Beyond dental radiographs, a radiomics-based study for the classification of caries extension and depth.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Traditional caries detection relies on visual and radiographic analysis. While deep learning has been applied to classify caries extent, no studies classify caries depth using radiomic features in intraoral photographic images. This study evaluated a radiomics-based approach with machine learning (ML) to classify caries extent and depth, traditionally assessed via radiographs, using intraoral photographs. Materials and methods: Standardized intraoral photographs were taken with a Nikon D7500 and Macro Flash MF-R76. Only images of healthy teeth or carious lesions were included. Images were resized, segmented with Labelme, and classified using ICDAS and E-D scales. Data augmentation increased sample size. Radiomic features were extracted for each color channel using Pyradiomics. Feature selection methods (AUC-ROC, ReliefF, LASSO, backward selection) were applied within 5-fold cross-validation to prevent bias. ML classifiers (LDA, k-NN, SVM, NNET) evaluated accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Model explainability assessed feature influence via partial dependence plots, residual analysis, and break-down profile. Results: NNET with backward selection achieved high accuracy (87.6%-95.4%). Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 61.5% to 93% and 73%-90%, respectively. Green and red channels significantly impacted predictions, with texture features being critical. The red channel's greater impact reflects its ability to mimic near-infrared light transillumination, enhancing contrast between healthy and decayed tissue. The blue channel had lesser influence, but combined RGB channels yielded the best accuracy. Conclusion: Radiomics enables caries depth classification from intraoral photographs, offering a non-invasive, cost-effective alternative to radiographs. This approach could revolutionize diagnostics by reducing reliance on invasive radiological techniques, using accessible and affordable equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.