ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Machine learning assisted breathomic approach for early-stage thoracic cancer detection.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study explores the feasibility of using breathomic biomarkers analyzed by machine learning as a non-invasive diagnostic tool to differentiate between benign and malignant thoracic lesions, aiming to enhance early detection of thoracic cancers and inform clinical decision-making. Methods: This study enrolled 132 participants with confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer, esophageal cancer, thymoma, and benign diseases. Exhaled breath samples were analyzed by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. A logistic regression algorithm was employed to construct a classification model for benign and malignant thoracic lesions. This model was trained on a subset of 80 cases and subsequently validated in a separate set comprising 52 samples. Results: A logistic regression model based on thirteen exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was developed to differentiate benign and malignant thoracic lesions. The 13-VOC model achieved an AUC of 0.85 (0.72, 0.96), accuracy of 0.79 (0.66, 0.88), sensitivity of 0.82 (0.67, 0.91), and a specificity of 0.71 (0.45, 0.88). It correctly classified 80% of lung cancer, 80% of thymoma, and 100% of esophageal cancer cases, distinguishing 71.4% of benign lesions. For lung cancer, the model achieved an AUC of 0.79 (0.57, 0.98), sensitivity of 0.80 (0.63, 0.91), and specificity of 0.63 (0.31, 0.86), with 81.8% accuracy in detecting early-stage (Stage 0 + I + II) disease. The model outperformed a 4-serum tumor marker panel in sensitivity (0.90 vs. 0.39, Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing breathomics biomarkers for developing a non-invasive machine learning model for the early diagnosis of thoracic malignancies. These findings provide a foundation for breath analysis as a promising tool for early cancer detection, potentially facilitating improved clinical decision-making and enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.