ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
The clinicopathological characteristics, oncologic outcomes and costs of "HER2-low" early breast cancer compared to HER2-zero and HER2-positive: a single-centre retrospective analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease commonly classified based on hormone receptor (HR) status and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. Recently, an intermediate category termed "HER2-low" has drawn attention for its potential prognostic and therapeutic implications. This study aimed to characterize the clinicopathological features, oncologic outcomes, and costs of "HER2-low" early breast cancer (eBC) in comparison with HER2-zero (HER2-0) and HER2-positive eBC. Methods: A single-center, retrospective analysis included patients with stage I-IIIA eBC diagnosed from January 2019 to December 2020. Patients were categorized into HER2-0, "HER2-low" (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-negative), or HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+/ISH-positive). Clinicopathological data, direct medical costs, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were examined. Kaplan-Meier analyses compared survival outcomes among groups, and Chi-square tests assessed differences in clinical characteristics. Results: Among 1,138 patients, 35.1% were HER2-0, 45.3% were "HER2-low", and 19.5% were HER2-positive. "HER2-low" eBC showed higher rates of HR positivity compared with HER2-0 (94% vs. 89%, p=0.018) and more frequent nodal involvement (39% vs. 30%, p=0.014). Compared with HER2-positive disease, "HER2-low" tumors presented at earlier stages, had fewer grade 3 tumors, and were less frequently treated with chemotherapy (56% vs. 83%, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in DFS or OS among the three groups within the study's follow-up period. Costs were highest for patients with HER2-positive eBC, primarily driven by targeted therapies (trastuzumab, pertuzumab, T-DM1). Conclusions: While "HER2-low" eBC demonstrates distinct clinicopathological features-particularly in terms of HR positivity and histological grade-this intermediate phenotype did not exhibit worse oncologic outcomes compared with HER2-0 or HER2-positive disease in the observed timeframe. Further research is needed to validate these findings and clarify the prognostic and therapeutic significance of "HER2-low" eBC, especially as new HER2-targeting agents emerge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.