ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Biomechanically optimized 3D-Printed titanium prostheses with stiffener arrangement for critical femoral diaphyseal defects: early weight-bearing capacity and combat readiness validated through integrated biomechanical-FEA approach.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical advantages of double-column bridging plate-augmented PFNA for complex subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- 3D printed microporous titanium prosthesis for single implantation or combined with free flap for infected bone defects in the limbs: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Advances in functional nanomaterials and piezoelectric biomaterials for personalized intramedullary fixation: addressing age-related orthopedic challenges.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Critical femoral diaphyseal defects exceeding 3 cm present significant challenges in trauma and military orthopedics, particularly in blast injury scenarios requiring rapid rehabilitation. Methods: The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the biomechanical Results: Key findings demonstrate comparable compressive stiffness between prostheses groups (Group A: 764.12±112.63 N/mm; Group B: 693.63±136.31 N/mm) and intact femurs (808.59±18.1 N/mm, p>0.05). The torsional stiffness is comparable between prostheses groups (Group A: 2.28±0.15 Nm/°; Group B: 2.18±0.22 Nm/°) versus diaphyseal fractures without defects (2.01±0.19 Nm/°). The stiffness results comply with mobilization requirements. FEA revealed maximum von Mises stresses in prosthesis fixation systems below the yield strength of Ti6Al4V, with digital image correlation validating the stress distribution patterns. The porous scaffold design achieved optimal modulus (1,132.85 MPa) between cortical and cancellous bone, reducing the "stress shielding" effect. Both prostheses endured 1800 N cyclic loading (100,000 cycles ≈, 13.3 years of physiological use) without structural failure. Discussion: These customized prostheses address critical military medical needs by enabling immediate weight-bearing, reducing surgical complexity compared to bone transport techniques, and maintaining long-term mechanical integrity. The stiffener design philosophy and additive manufacturing flexibility provide adaptable solutions for complex combat-related trauma, significantly advancing early functional recovery in resource-constrained environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.