ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Noninvasive profiling of input-output excitability curves in human prefrontal cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in cognitive control and behavior, and its dysfunction has been linked to numerous psychiatric and neurological disorders. However, noninvasive measurement of prefrontal activity remains challenging, limiting our understanding of how to optimize prefrontal treatments. Input-output relationships reveal how neural circuits respond to different inputs and are essential for determining optimal treatment parameters and understanding individual variability in treatment response, yet systematic investigation of prefrontal input-output relationships has been lacking. Objective: To characterize human prefrontal excitability with input-output (I/O) curves. Methods: We employed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography in a randomized mixed-block design with 28 healthy participants receiving single-pulse TMS to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) across 12 stimulation intensities (60-140% of resting motor threshold). We quantified prefrontal excitability using early local TMS-evoked potentials (EL-TEPs), cortical responses measured locally 20-60 ms post-stimulus. Results: We observed a strong effect of TMS intensity on prefrontal EL-TEP amplitudes. Sigmoidal EL-TEP I/O curves were observed in 57% of participants, with the sigmoidality partially explained by EL-TEP signal quality. Correlations were observed between EL-TEP and motor-evoked potential curve parameters, but intensity parameterization approaches did not significantly differ in explaining inter-individual EL-TEP response variability. Reliable EL-TEPs could be obtained using fewer TMS pulses at high intensities, and test-retest assessments revealed robust I/O curve profiles. Conclusions: These findings provide a systematic noninvasive characterization of prefrontal input-output physiology, establishing a framework for estimating prefrontal excitability. The comparison of various intensity parameterizations motivates the need for enhanced models and individualized measurement of stimulation responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.