In one paragraphArticle in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
9 authors.
Meghan J O'MeliaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2223-1849 Miranda A RobertDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lutz MenzelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3816-6255 Lingshan LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-3904-478X Pin-Ji LeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2539-5179 Lance L MunnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0698-7232 Timothy P PaderaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Edwin L. Steele Laboratories, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3453-9384 Funding
cGMP Manufacture, Fill-Finish, Release, Analytical and Stability Testing and Stability Program of a Nanoparticle Based HIV Envelope Vaccine75N93022D00005 · NIAID · INTERNATIONAL AIDS VACCINE INITIATIVE · PI HASSELL, THOMAS · 2022 to 2025
$8.0MTargeting physical stress-driven mechanisms to overcome glioblastoma treatment resistanceU01CA261842 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JAIN, RAKESH K., MUNN, LANCE L. · 2021 to 2025
$3.1MSystems biology of lymphatic transportR01HL128168 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MUNN, LANCE L., PADERA, TIMOTHY P · 2015 to 2019
$2.9MTargeting lymph node metastases to prevent cancer progressionR01CA214913 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PADERA, TIMOTHY P · 2017 to 2022
$2.0MTargeting lymph node metastases to block cancer progressionR01CA284372 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TIMOTHY P PADERA · 2023 to 2026
$2.0MSystems Biology of Antigen and T-Cell Transport in Cancer ImmunotherapyR01CA284603 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Lance L. Munn, TIMOTHY P PADERA · 2023 to 2026
$1.9MVascularized tumor explants for drug testingR01CA247441 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MUNN, LANCE L. · 2021 to 2025
$1.9MReversing aging-induced lymphatic dysfunction to improve immune functionR21AG072205 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PADERA, TIMOTHY P · 2022 to 2023
$458kA mechanistic dissection of the role of Eya3 in breast cancer metastasisK00CA234940 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ZHOU, HENGBO · 2020 to 2023
$405kEnhanced antigen-lymphocyte interactions to improve immune checkpoint blockade in breast cancerF32CA275298 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI O'MELIA, MEGHAN · 2022 to 2024
$213kNCI NIH HHS F32 CA275298NCI NIH HHS K00 CA234940NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214913NCI NIH HHS R01 CA247441NCI NIH HHS R01 CA284372NCI NIH HHS R01 CA284603NCI NIH HHS U01 CA261842NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128168NIAID NIH HHS 75N93022D00005NIAID NIH HHS 75N93023D00005NIA NIH HHS R21 AG072205
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Oncolytic viruses have strong potential as immunotherapies. By causing cancer cells to die and relieve antigens, these viruses can stimulate robust, systemic immune responses that may eliminate disseminated disease and prevent recurrence. Unfortunately, clinical trials using oncolytic viruses have not induced clearance of metastasis or protection from recurrence. Likewise, the combination of the only FDA-approved oncolytic virus-Talimogene laherparapvec-with immune checkpoint blockade did not improve progression-free or overall survival. Because of these disappointing clinical trials, we sought to measure the ability of oncolytic viruses to induce cancer antigen presentation and the elicitation of cancer antigen-specific immune responses. Our data revealed that despite improved antigen presentation by dendritic cells, priming of cancer antigen-specific T cells was limited. However, viral antigen-specific T cells did develop and were in a phenotypic state to induce an effective response against virally infected cells. These preclinical results were mirrored in human peripheral blood samples. Overall, these data show that oncolytic virus treatment induces a response against the virus itself, but not cancer antigen, explaining the lack of response in metastatic disease. These interesting findings identify a critical mechanism that needs to be overcome to increase the efficacy of oncolytic virus therapy.
Identifiers
PMID41040229
PMCPMC12485707
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390