Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040220›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Fine-tuning sequence to function deep learning models on large-scale proteomic data improves the accuracy of variant effect prediction.

Eduarda Vaz, Lena Wang, Jake Galvin, Rebecca Keener, Alexis Battle

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eduarda VazDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Lena WangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jake GalvinCell, Molecular, Developmental Biology, and Biophysics program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rebecca KeenerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alexis BattleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Modeling the dynamicimpact of rare and common genetic variation on gene expression anddiseaseR35GM139580 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BATTLE, ALEXIS · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fine-tuning sequence to function models has shown promise for variant effect prediction, but accuracy and generalization to unseen genes and unseen individuals remains a standing challenge. We fine-tuned Borzoi on 54,219 individuals and 2,923 circulating plasma proteins from the UK Biobank Plasma Proteomic Project. Across 150 single-gene models where the genes had a range of cis-heritability we observed that the fine-tuned Borzoi model improved variant effect prediction for 86% of the genes compared to an Elastic Net baseline model. We demonstrated that the improved prediction stems from increased sample size which provides tremendous amounts of rare genetic variants (MAF < 0.01) to the training data. Masking rare and uncommon variants nullified improved performance of fine-tuned Borzoi and we showed that fine-tuned Borzoi highly weights rare variants (MAF < 0.01) while the Elastic Net model highly weights common variants (MAF > 0.05) that are enriched for regulatory regions. We evaluated the generalizability of our model on a fine-tuned Borzoi model trained jointly on varying numbers of genes and observed that these models consistently outperform the pre-trained Borzoi model, the single-gene models yield more accurate results. Together this work demonstrates the importance of including larger sample sizes and rare variants in sequence to function models for variant effect prediction and demonstrates feasibility that these models are capable of highly accurate variant effect prediction.

Identifiers

PMID41040220
PMCPMC12485912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.