ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
MechFind: A computational framework for de novo prediction of enzyme mechanisms.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the importance of understanding the step-by-step mechanism of enzymatically catalyzed reactions, fewer than one thousand cataloged mechanistic annotations can be found in the open literature and databases. Herein, we introduce MechFind, a computational tool that generates elementally and charge-balanced putative enzyme mechanisms. Unlike previous methods that require structural data or user-supplied active site residues, MechFind uses only the overall reaction stoichiometry as input, abstracting individual reaction steps as the gain or loss of chemical moieties. An optimization framework then identifies the top ten most parsimonious (i.e., fewest steps) mechanistic descriptions for the overall transformation, which are then re-ranked based on their mechanistic similarity to a database of known, curated mechanisms. MechFind recovered the correct mechanism for 72% of the Mechanism and Catalytic Site Atlas (M-CSA) training dataset within the top ten predictions and was independently validated on six enzyme mechanisms absent from the training set. When deployed at scale on 28,412 reactions from the Rhea database, MechFind identified a plausible mechanism for 64% of all entries, generating over 18,000 novel mechanistic hypotheses expanding significantly upon the current state of the art in prediction (i.e., a 20-fold increase). By proposing detailed reaction mechanisms MechFind provides information that can be leveraged by modern ML-based de novo protein design tools, offering a resource for improving functional annotation and accelerating the engineering of novel biocatalysts. All codes, curated datasets, and results are available at https://github.com/maranasgroup/MechFind.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.