ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The heart's eye: how mental imagery influences romantic emotion.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While mental imagery-the capacity to generate perceptual-like experiences in the absence of external stimuli-has been studied in fear and other domains, its influence in romantic emotional experiences has not been directly examined. Based on this hypothesis, we investigated how imagery vividness influences romantic emotions and their physiological underpinnings. Methods: Firstly, we reviewed our previous questionnaire data. Furthermore, we compared individuals with vivid imagery and aphantasia, a condition characterized by the absence of voluntary visual imagery, using electroencephalogram (EEG) and heart rate variability (HRV) during a romantic imagery task. Results: Those with vivid imagery showed stronger neural markers (larger P3 amplitudes, extended LPPs, reduced occipital alpha activity) and heightened autonomic arousal (increased heart rate, suppressed HRV). Aphantasic participants exhibited muted neural responses and minimal autonomic changes, reflecting weaker emotional embodiment. Discussion: These findings underscore that vivid visual imagery is a crucial driver of romantic emotional intensity and duration, whereas the absence of imagery can lead to a markedly diminished emotional experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.