Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040076›Full record

ArticleActa medica Philippina2025

Cecal Perforation in an Adolescent as a Paradoxical Response to Anti-tuberculosis Treatment: A Case Report.

Pilarica I Caguiat-Jo, Germana Emerita V Gregorio

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pilarica I Caguiat-JoDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila.
Germana Emerita V GregorioDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paradoxical response to anti-tuberculosis treatment, defined as clinical or radiologic worsening of pre-existing lesions or the development of new lesions while ongoing treatment, poses diagnostic dilemma. Intestinal perforation as a paradoxical response is rare. We report a 10-year-old female who presented with recurrent abdominal pain, anorexia, and bloody diarrhea, and was diagnosed with disseminated tuberculosis. She had marked improvement after one month of anti-tuberculosis treatment but developed a recurrence of initial symptoms on the third month of therapy and was treated for cecal perforation. Histopathology of cecum revealed chronic granulomatous inflammation. The patient improved after the surgery and the resumption of anti-tuberculosis medications. Recognition of paradoxical reactions and differentiating it from drug resistance of other pathology is important as these necessitates different management strategies.

Indexed as

case reportintestinal perforationintestinal tuberculosisparadoxical reaction

Identifiers

PMID41040076
PMCPMC12487434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.