ArticleActa orthopaedica2025
Serious adverse events, readmission, and mortality after shoulder replacement due to fracture, osteoarthritis, and other indications: a population-based comparison with the general population.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposePatients treated with shoulder arthroplasty may risk serious adverse events (SAEs), readmission, and death; however, the literature is inconsistent. Therefore, we aimed to compare the incidence rates of SAEs, readmissions, and mortality at 30 and 90 days following shoulder replacement with those of a matched cohort.
methodsDanish databases were used to include patients treated with a primary shoulder replacement due to fracture, osteoarthritis, cuff tear arthropathy, and other (2006-2021). The shoulder patients were compared (1:10) to a matched cohort from the general population. Incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated and adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidity.
resultsThe 30-day IR of SAEs was 73.5 for shoulder patients and 14.8 for the matched cohort. The IRR of SAEs was higher for all patient groups compared with the matched cohort and varied between indications for surgery (IRR 3.1-5.9) and remained higher at 90 days (IRR 1.6-3.5). The IR of readmission was 234 per 100,000 person-days at 30 days. The 30-day IR of mortality was 20.2 per 100,000 person-days for shoulder patients and 9.4 per 100,000 person-days for the matched cohort. Compared with the matched cohort the 30-day IRR of mortality was 2.0, with fracture patients having the highest risk of mortality (IRR of 3.5).
conclusionAt 30 and 90 days after surgery, shoulder patients, regardless of surgical indications, had higher rates of SAEs than the matched cohort. The mortality rate was higher for shoulder patients and highest for fracture patients. This information should be included in the shared decision-making process before undergoing shoulder replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.