ArticleCardiovascular research2025
CTLA-4-Ig therapy preserves cardiac function following myocardial infarction with reperfusion.
Article in Cardiovascular research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Costimulation Blockade Increases Risk of Ventricular Rupture in a Preclinical Model of Transmural Myocardial Injury.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Article
- Human Leukocyte Antigen Determinants in Myocarditis and Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Current heart failure reports · 2026Review
- Targeting the heart-immune axis after myocardial infarction: from inflammation to immunomodulation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cardiotoxicity: from immune mechanisms to clinical surveillance and targeted therapies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Treatment with saturating dose of conventional anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody well tolerated in pig acute myocardial infarction model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Macrophage polarization in ischemia-reperfusion injury: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsT cells drive adverse cardiac inflammation and ischemia-reperfusion injury following myocardial infarction (MI). Here, we aimed to test the extent to which T cell inhibition protected cardiac function following MI in mice. METHODS AND
resultsCardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury (CIRI), mimicking MI with successful reperfusion therapy, was induced in C57BL/6J mice via temporary surgical ligation of the left anterior descending artery. T cell inhibition was achieved using abatacept, an FDA-approved CTLA-4-Ig fusion protein. Multiple treatment strategies were assessed, ranging from prolonged treatment across 4 weeks to short-term treatment, also with delayed time-to-intervention. Cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography, including strain analysis. Impacts on the cardiac and systemic immune response were assessed using flow cytometry. CIRI-induced robust CD4+ biased T cell activation in the heart within 7 days. Treatment with abatacept significantly preserved key echocardiographic metrics of cardiac function. This treatment coincided with near-complete inhibition of the cardiac T cell response, as well as reductions in innate inflammatory cells. Collectively, this demonstrated a central mechanistic role for T cell activation post-MI with reperfusion. Evaluation of short-term intervention strategies further demonstrated sustained preservation of cardiac function even where treatment was delayed by 24 h. Mechanistically, our data indicate that over 50% of lost cardiac function post-MI with reperfusion is T cell dependent.
conclusionT cell co-stimulation leading to activation is a central driver of the cardiac immune response following MI with reperfusion. The inhibition of this axis significantly protected against CIRI and preserved cardiac function. Ultimately, we highlight T cell immunomodulation and abatacept as highly promising approaches for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.