ArticleHistology and histopathology2026
Comparable expression of stem markers and damage-responsive proteins in untreated and chemoradiation-treated rectal cancer.
Article in Histology and histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCancer stem cells (CSCs) are suggested to contribute to therapy resistance in rectal cancer. However, histopathological analysis of CSCs is still lacking in rectal cancer.
methodsThe expression of leucine-rich, repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5), proto-oncogene, polycomb ring finger 1 (BMI1), yes-associated transcriptional regulator (YAP) and its paralog TAZ (hereafter, YAP/TAZ), and nuclear β-catenin was compared in untreated and chemoradiation-treated (CRT) rectal cancer by
resultsThe mean ratios were 15% and 14% for LGR5, 30% and 33% for BMI1, 2.7% and 7.6% for YAP/TAZ, and 38% and 32% for nuclear β-catenin in untreated and CRT rectal cancer, respectively, showing no significant differences for these stem markers following CRT. The stromal expression ratios of YAP/TAZ were 9.7% and 23% in untreated and CRT rectal cancer, which indicated significant upregulation and confirmation of the damage response in the stroma of CRT tumors. In addition, cancer cells co-expressing LGR5 and CDKN1B are also comparable in untreated and CRT rectal cancer. For niche factors, we found that WNT2B and GREM1 were uniformly expressed in rectal cancer with a pattern similar to that of the early embryonic intestine.
conclusionThe expression of LGR5, BMI1, CDKN1B, and YAP/TAZ was comparable in untreated and CRT rectal cancer. The uniform expression of mesenchymal niche factors might prevent the zonation of the stem cell niche in rectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41039949What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.