Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039900›Full record

ArticleJournal of texture studies2025

Comprehensive Textural Characterization of Tuna Muscle to Drive Development of Plant-Based Analogs.

Daphne Jumilla-Lorenz, Dolors Parés

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of texture studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daphne Jumilla-LorenzCurrent Foods, Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1022-5142
Dolors ParésInstitute of Food and Agricultural Technology (INTEA), University of Girona (UdG), Girona, Spain.

Funding

Current Foods, Inc.Generalitat de Catalunya "Doctorats Industrials" programme (reference 2021 DI 018)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive textural characterization of raw bluefin and yellowfin tuna muscle to establish reference parameters for developing plant-based analogs (PBAs) designed for raw consumption. Five instrumental texture tests were performed on samples from both groups of species (n = 64): Texture Profile Analysis, surface compression, puncture, shear, and tensile tests. The anisotropic nature of tuna muscle was evaluated by applying forces both perpendicular and parallel to connective tissue layers. Results revealed minimal textural differences between bluefin and yellowfin species, though significant anisotropy was observed across all mechanical tests depending on test methodology and attribute. Force-distance curves from puncture tests demonstrated a strong correlation (R

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalSeafoodTunaAnimalsAnisotropyTensile Strengthanisotropic textureinstrumental texture characterizationmuscle structureplant‐based tuna analogstexture profile analysis

Identifiers

PMID41039900
PMCPMC12491986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.