ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2026
"You Say Cognitive, I Say Cognitive": Can Misinformation-Informed Interventions Help Reduce Risk for Disordered Eating in Youth?
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tick-Tock, the Time Has Come: Leveraging TikTok to Understand, Prevent, and Treat Eating Disorders.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Review
- "You Say Cognitive, I Say Cognitive": Can Misinformation-Informed Interventions Help Reduce Risk for Disordered Eating in Youth?The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis paper explores how cognitive models from misinformation research can enhance existing interventions for eating disorder (ED) risk, particularly in youth. We argue that frameworks developed to counter belief formation in misinformation offer a novel and underexplored avenue for intervening earlier in the pathway to disordered eating, particularly in environments saturated with persuasive -appearance- and -diet-related content that increase ED risk.
methodWe suggest that cognitive mechanisms implicated in both ED vulnerability and susceptibility to misinformation offer overlapping targets for intervention. Drawing on both literatures, we outline how -misinformation-informed strategies such as prebunking, inoculation, and content evaluation tasks can serve as complementary, brief, digitally delivered interventions.
resultsThe integration of interventions tackling processing increasing ED risk with misinformation-informed approaches may be well-suited to reduce ED risk in young people who primarily use social media for appearance reasons. These may be more effective when placed within short-form, algorithm-driven social media environments where individuals encounter problematic content with limited clinical oversight. DISCUSSION: Misinformation-informed strategies offer new cognitive leverage points that complement existing ED interventions. When adapted thoughtfully, these tools may serve as low-burden, scalable prevention approaches that extend support beyond the clinic and into the digital spaces where risk often emerges. We propose five concrete steps to explore this research stream.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.