ReviewImmunology2025
Exhaustion-Resistant CD8
Review in Immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mendelian randomization analysis links HLA-DR+ CD14- CD16+ monocytes to CCL19-driven ankylosing spondylitis risk.Medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-Omics Integration Identifies a Six-Gene Diagnostic Signature for Ankylosing Spondylitis via Metabolic-Immune Crosstalk.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Exhaustion-Resistant CD8Immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic immune-mediated disease marked by sustained joint inflammation and aberrant bone remodelling. Although chronic antigen exposure usually enforces terminal exhaustion, emerging evidence indicates that a subset of CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.