ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026
Effect of Resin Coating on Dentin Bond Strength Under Immediate and Delayed Cementation Protocols.
Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Resin Coating on Dentin Bond Strength Under Immediate and Delayed Cementation Protocols.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of resin coatings on bond strength using immediate and delayed cementation protocols. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred twenty dentin specimens were assigned to four groups: Noncoated, TK- 100B (a novel single-bottle adhesive), Hybrid Coat II, and Clearfil SE bond 2. The specimens of the latter three groups were resin coated with their respective materials. Each group was subdivided into immediate and delayed cementation after 1-week provisionalization with a polycarboxylate cement. All specimens were luted with resin cement and subjected to shear bond testing. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).
resultsTK- 100B and Clearfil SE Bond 2 produced significantly higher bond strengths than the non-coated group for both cementation schedules. Delayed cementation reduced the bond strengths of Hybrid Coat II and Clearfil SE Bond 2 (p < 0.05), whereas the non-coated group and TK- 100B showed no time-related changes. Most failures in the resin-coated groups occurred at the resin-cement interface.
conclusionsBonding strength was enhanced with TK- 100B and Clearfil SE Bond 2. A 1-week delay weakened Hybrid Coat II and Clearfil SE Bond 2 but had no effect on non-coated dentin or TK- 100B, confirming material-specific effects. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Both the novel single-bottle adhesive TK-100B and the established Clearfil SE Bond 2 yield high bond strengths when used as resin coatings in both immediate and 1-week delayed cementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.