Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039789›Full record

ArticleInternational endodontic journal2026

Uncertainty in Relation to Clinical Experience-A Qualitative Study on Dental Students' Reflections on Risk Assessment of Root Filled Teeth.

Joséphine Brodén, Maria Pigg, Niklas Vareman, Helena Fransson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joséphine BrodénDepartment of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9300-2520
Maria PiggDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Niklas VaremanDepartment of Medical Ethics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Helena FranssonDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

FORESIGHT multidisciplinary research programme at Malmö University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn uncertain clinical situations, such as assessing the risk of exacerbation of apical periodontitis in root-filled teeth, undergraduate students can benefit from being trained to reflect. This study aimed to explore how students specifically reflected on clinical experiences in relation to uncertainty when assessing a case involving a root-filled tooth with apical periodontitis. METHODOLOGY: Short reflections were written by 52 dental students at Malmö University in 2021. All students were asked to reflect on the risk for exacerbation of apical periodontitis in a case with a root-filled tooth with a diffuse widening of the periodontal ligament space. The reflections were written according to prompts developed to stimulate reflection. For each student, the reflections were analysed by a qualitative method, Systematic Text Condensation (STC).

resultsThe analysis of the qualitative data resulted in the formulation of two themes about experience and lack of experience: Theme 1 'The meaning of clinical experience' and Theme 2 'Differences and similarities'. The themes were subdivided into nine subgroups and described the relationship between experience and certainty.

conclusionsThe students believed that certainty comes with experience even when there is a lack of scientific evidence.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePeriapical PeriodontitisStudents, DentalAdultEducation, DentalFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentUncertainty[clinical] decision‐makingdental educationendodonticsperiapical periodontitisuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID41039789
PMCPMC13158542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.