Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Prehospital management of accidental hypothermia: A nationwide survey among Italian helicopter emergency medical services.
Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccidental hypothermia, defined as a drop in core temperature below 35 °C, is a significant concern in prehospital care. Despite Italy’s variable climate and demographic vulnerability, limited data exist on how Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) manage hypothermic patients nationally. This study aimed to describe operational practices, equipment availability, specialized and critical care interventions for accidental hypothermia across Italian HEMS.
methodsA nationwide observational survey was conducted between February 4 and March 7, 2025, targeting all 56 Italian HEMS bases. Operational characteristics, diagnostic and monitoring resources, passive and active warming equipment, specialized and critical care interventions, and training protocols were assessed. Data were analyzed descriptively, with comparisons to international guideline recommendations and evidence-based standards.
resultsFifty-five (98.2%) bases responded. Operational models varied considerably, with 46% providing 24-hour service and 21% capable of night-time hoist operations. 70% reported availability of thermometers capable of detecting hypothermia, but among these, nearly one-third still relied on measurement methods not recommended by international guidelines. Passive insulation was universally available but frequently limited to basic reflective foil blankets, lacking comprehensive multilayer systems. Over half of services (54%) had no active external rewarming devices. Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was widely accessible, coordination with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)-capable centers was reported by nearly two-thirds of services, while portable blood gas analyzers remained rarely available. Hypothermia-specific training was absent in 27% of services, and seasonal equipment adaptations occurred in only 34%. Identified needs included enhanced warming devices, improved temperature monitoring, and standardized protocols.
conclusionSubstantial variability and important gaps exist in hypothermia management across Italian HEMS, particularly in temperature monitoring accuracy, active rewarming capabilities, structured passive insulation strategies, and specialized training. These findings underline the urgent need for more standardized protocols, targeted equipment improvement, and simulation-based training to optimize prehospital hypothermia care in Italy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.