ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2025
An innovative hybrid imaging protocol for whole-body
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of cardiac involvement in oncology patients is critical but challenging. To date, no validated protocol integrates dedicated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) within routine whole-body (WB)
objectivesThis proof-of-concept study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel hybrid imaging protocol combining CMR and WB
methodsFifteen patients with suspected or confirmed multiple myeloma (MM) were enrolled. All participants scheduled for oncologic
resultsThe protocol was successfully completed in all participants without adverse events, enabling comprehensive cardiac and oncologic assessment within an average procedure time of 115 min (cumulative scanning time 65.5 ± 9.8 min). Clinically relevant cardiac abnormalities were identified in 4 patients (27%), including reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, concentric hypertrophy, and increased myocardial
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of a novel, time-efficient, integrated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.