Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039594›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Policy and preference: the intersection of attendance hurdles and student perceptions of practical classes.

Karen J Donald, Anthea Cochrane, Samantha Byrne, Lisa Cheshire, Jessica Stander, Tamara Clements, Sue Finch, Nicole Hill, Elaina Kefalianos, Jessica Lees and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Karen J DonaldDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. k.donald@latrobe.edu.au.
Anthea CochraneDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Samantha ByrneMelbourne Dental School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne , Australia.
Lisa CheshireMelbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Jessica StanderDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Tamara ClementsMelbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sue FinchStatistical Consulting Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Nicole HillDepartment of Social Work, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Elaina KefalianosDepartment of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Jessica LeesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Miki MaruyamaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Lauren StoryDepartment of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Bronwyn TarrantDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Debra VirtueDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Travis HaberDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPractical classes and skills labs, where students learn, practice, and demonstrate key professional and technical skills, are essential in health professional education. As such, attendance at practical classes has historically been mandated and, in some cases, an "attendance hurdle" (i.e., mandatory minimum attendance requirement that students must meet to pass the course) is applied to subjects where practical classes are a core part of the curriculum. We aimed to explore students' attitudes, beliefs and experiences of attendance hurdles for practical classes.

methodsWe surveyed students from entry-to-practice programs in Medicine, Dentistry, Oral Health, Optometry, Physiotherapy, Social Work, Nursing, and Speech Pathology who were currently or previously enrolled in a subject/s with attendance hurdles for practical classes. In a single online survey, students answered multiple-choice, ranking, and Likert questions about their attitudes, beliefs, and experiences of attendance hurdles for practical classes. Data were analysed descriptively and with Pearson chi-squared test of association.

resultsSixty-three percent (n=362) of 575 students who completed the survey wanted to maintain attendance hurdles. In contrast, almost 80% of students stated they would attend 80% or more of classes without attendance hurdles. Many students believed that attendance hurdles could adversely affect some individuals (e.g., due to personal circumstances and sociodemographics), and half believed as adult learners, they should decide whether to attend practical classes. Students valued the in-class tutor feedback and application to clinical practice that practical classes offered. Students suggested that greater flexibility in the timing of practical classes would be more likely than hurdles to improve attendance.

conclusionsThe advantages of participating in practical classes to develop essential clinical skills are evident to students, and likely motivate them to attend most scheduled classes. Numerous factors can lead to student absences, and mandating attendance may disadvantage some students. Alternatives to attendance policies could include offering scheduling flexibility and student sign-up, accommodating students' personal and health needs, and aligning classes to student values.

Indexed as

Students, Health OccupationsStudents, MedicalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41039594
PMCPMC12492628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.