Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039569›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

Protocol for a feasibility randomized control trial of the Supporting Toddlers with a connection to autism or ADHD to develop Strong Attention, Regulation, and Thinking skills (START) programme.

Alexandra Hendry, Maryna Nosyk, Victoria Hulks, Jemma Hudson, Lynda Constable, Tony Charman, Sandra Mathers, Sinead Rhodes, Gaia Scerif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexandra HendryDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. alexandra.hendry@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1985-2521
Maryna NosykDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Victoria HulksDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jemma HudsonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Lynda ConstableHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Tony CharmanInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Sandra MathersDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sinead RhodesCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Gaia ScerifDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism and ADHD are heritable, co-occurrent, and associated with difficulties with executive functioning (cognitive and self-regulation skills which enable us to set and work toward goals). Executive function difficulties, and their negative impacts across cognitive, health and social domains, extend to individuals with first-degree relatives who are autistic or have ADHD, even if they do not meet thresholds for a clinical diagnosis themselves. Supporting executive function development in children with elevated autism traits, or a first-degree relative with autism or ADHD, addresses community priorities for early support to help achieve the best mental health, education and life outcomes.

methodsThis study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a parent-toddler programme entitled "Supporting Toddlers with a connection to autism or ADHD to develop strong Attention, Regulation and Thinking skills" (START). START is a neurodiversity-affirming programme, co-refined through extensive Patient and Public Involvement. Sixty parent-child dyads, in Oxford or Southampton (UK), will be randomized using Sealed Envelope by a researcher not involved in recruitment, delivery or outcome data collection to receive START or usual practice, on a 1:1 ratio. Children (20 months old) will be assessed using questionnaires completed by the parent (not blind to allocation) post-intervention (within 2 weeks of the end of the active intervention wave, when children are aged 27-31 months), and using parent questionnaires and a battery of executive function measures administered by researchers blind to allocation at baseline and follow-up (36 months old). START will be delivered in small groups to 30 parent-child dyads, in community settings. DISCUSSION: We will assess the feasibility of recruiting eligible participants to the study, the reliability of measures of implementation fidelity and degree of implementation fidelity achieved, the appropriateness of proposed outcome and mechanism measures, the acceptability of an RCT of the programme, parental adherence to the programme, logistics of programme delivery, and the acceptability of START, using mixed-method measures of engagement and satisfaction. Results will inform the design and implementation of a definitive RCT of START, and yield broader insights into the delivery and evaluation of complex early-years interventions in community settings.

trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN99820028 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN99820028 .

Indexed as

ADHDAutismCognitive developmentEmotion regulationExecutive functionsFeasibilityNeurodiversityParentRandomized controlled trialToddler

Identifiers

PMID41039569
PMCPMC12492924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.