ArticleBMC medical education2025
Impact of continuing professional development (CPD) on patient outcomes: a systematic scoping review.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Programme-level redesign and student outcomes in specialist post-registration ophthalmic nursing education: a cohort study.BMC medical education · 2026Observational
- Nurse's perspectives on continuing professional development at Zomba Central Hospital, Malawi: a qualitative inquiry.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of career growth among early-career operating room nurses: a cross-sectional study informed by Conservation of Resources theory.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' knowledge and views on unmet needs in prevention of infectious comorbidities in pregnant women with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Primary care provider's barriers to effective management of apparently resistant hypertension in Malaysian public primary health care and strategies to overcome them: a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- The Role of Gaze in Shaping Forms of Reflective Practice: A Legitimation Code Theory Analysis of Clinical Supervision in Danish Primary Care.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Antipsychotic prescribing patterns and determinants in first-episode psychosis: a 2019-2024 cross-sectional study from Zambia.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Influence of self-efficacy and self-directed learning competence on core competence among nurses specializing in infectious diseases: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Awareness, attitudes, and self-reported clinical management of antimicrobial-associated neurocognitive adverse effects among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- A practice-embedded, PDSA-guided implementation study of continuing professional development for stoma care in a resource-constrained setting.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A program theory for a continuing professional development program to enhance primary care nurses' mental health assessment practices.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Continuing Medical Education as a Tool to Accelerate the Adoption of Extended-Duration Intravitreal Anti-VEGFs.Journal of CME · 2026Article
- Accredited Continuing Medical Education Delivers: Evidence of Value, Trust, and Impact Across the Healthcare System.Journal of CME · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuing Professional Development (CPD) is vital for maintaining healthcare professionals' competence in providing quality patient care. However, evidence linking CPD directly to patient outcomes remains limited and methodologically diverse, hindering generalizable conclusions. This scoping review synthesises available evidence on the impact of CPD participation on patient outcomes, identifies patterns in intervention design and outcome measures, and explores key implementation and contextual factors that influence CPD effectiveness.
methodsIn September 2024 PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for studies that assessed the impact of CPD interventions on patient health outcomes in healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for eligibility and charted the data. Findings were synthesized using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative summary and qualitative content analysis.
resultsOf 1562 records screened, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the articles (n = 16) originated from high-income countries. Multi-component CPD interventions, particularly those with sustained support and practical skills development, demonstrated greater effectiveness than standalone educational activities. Positive patient outcomes were reported in 14 studies, including reduced hypoglycemic events, and shorter ICU stays. The most impactful interventions were those implemented with organizational support, clear protocols, and ongoing reinforcement. Nevertheless, the evidence base was constrained by variations in outcome measures (e.g., mortality rates, complication rates, functional scores), and short follow-up durations.
conclusionsDespite CPD's prominence in healthcare systems, only a few studies directly evaluate it to improved patient outcomes. This review highlights that CPD programs incorporating practical skill development, protocol-based implementation, organizational support, and ongoing reinforcement can enhance patient care. Future research should adopt rigorous methodologies, consistent outcome measures, and long-term follow-up to better evaluate CPD's effectiveness. Additionally, CPD providers should prioritize integrated approaches between theoretical knowledge, applied practice, and continuous support mechanisms to maximize clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.