Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039533›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Impact of continuing professional development (CPD) on patient outcomes: a systematic scoping review.

Salwa Ali, Ahsan Sethi, Abderrezzaq Soltani, Zachariah Nazar

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Salwa AliCollege of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Ahsan SethiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Abderrezzaq SoltaniOffice of the Vice President for Health and Medical Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Zachariah NazarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy & Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. znazar@qu.edu.qa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuing Professional Development (CPD) is vital for maintaining healthcare professionals' competence in providing quality patient care. However, evidence linking CPD directly to patient outcomes remains limited and methodologically diverse, hindering generalizable conclusions. This scoping review synthesises available evidence on the impact of CPD participation on patient outcomes, identifies patterns in intervention design and outcome measures, and explores key implementation and contextual factors that influence CPD effectiveness.

methodsIn September 2024 PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for studies that assessed the impact of CPD interventions on patient health outcomes in healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened the articles for eligibility and charted the data. Findings were synthesized using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative summary and qualitative content analysis.

resultsOf 1562 records screened, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most of the articles (n = 16) originated from high-income countries. Multi-component CPD interventions, particularly those with sustained support and practical skills development, demonstrated greater effectiveness than standalone educational activities. Positive patient outcomes were reported in 14 studies, including reduced hypoglycemic events, and shorter ICU stays. The most impactful interventions were those implemented with organizational support, clear protocols, and ongoing reinforcement. Nevertheless, the evidence base was constrained by variations in outcome measures (e.g., mortality rates, complication rates, functional scores), and short follow-up durations.

conclusionsDespite CPD's prominence in healthcare systems, only a few studies directly evaluate it to improved patient outcomes. This review highlights that CPD programs incorporating practical skill development, protocol-based implementation, organizational support, and ongoing reinforcement can enhance patient care. Future research should adopt rigorous methodologies, consistent outcome measures, and long-term follow-up to better evaluate CPD's effectiveness. Additionally, CPD providers should prioritize integrated approaches between theoretical knowledge, applied practice, and continuous support mechanisms to maximize clinical impact.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHealth PersonnelOutcome Assessment, Health CareHumansContinuing professional development (CPD)Healthcare educationKnowledge translationPatient outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41039533
PMCPMC12492535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.