ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Interpretable deep learning model and nomogram for predicting pathological grading of PNETs based on endoscopic ultrasound.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence versus conventional imaging for differentiating G2/G3 from G1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From Image-Based Diagnosis to Cytopathology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Explainable deep learning and radiomics integration for differentiating insulinomas from NF-PNETs in EUS imaging.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to develop and validate an interpretable deep learning (DL) model and a nomogram based on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images for the prediction of pathological grading in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 108 patients with PNETs, who were divided into train (n = 81, internal center) and test cohorts (n = 27, external centers). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used for screening demographic characteristics and EUS semantic features. Deep transfer learning was employed using a pre-trained ResNet18 model to extract features from EUS images. Feature selection was conducted using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and various machine learning algorithms were utilized to construct DL models. The optimal model was then integrated with clinical features to develop a nomogram. The performance of the model was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curves (CIC).
resultsThe nomogram, which integrates the optimal DL model (Naive Bayes) with clinical features, achieved AUC values of 0.928 (95% CI 0.849–0.981) in the train cohort and 0.882 (95% CI 0.778–0.954) in the test cohort. Calibration curves revealed minimal discrepancies between predicted and actual probabilities, with mean absolute errors of 4.5% and 6.6% in the train and test cohorts, respectively. DCA and CIC demonstrated substantial net benefit and clinical utility. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method provided insights into the contribution of each DL feature to the model’s predictions.
conclusionThis study developed and validated a novel interpretable DL model and nomogram using EUS images and machine learning, which holds promise for enhancing the clinical application of EUS in identifying PNETs’ pathological grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.