ArticleBMC medical education2025
Health professional students' perspectives on diversity and inclusion in anatomy curricula.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth professional students exposed to diverse curricula, covering a range of subjects, personnel, and resources, are better prepared to understand perspectives different from their own. Anatomy courses can be a place to model and reinforce a variety of diversity and inclusion topics as the inherent variations in the human body naturally lend themselves to emphasize such content. This study aimed to explore students' perceptions on the importance of incorporating diversity into anatomy courses and whether they feel adequately represented in their curricula.
methodsA voluntary survey was distributed to 505 students currently enrolled in or recently completing an anatomy course.
resultsResults collected from 186 students revealed that 70.5% of students considered diversity inclusion in anatomy curricula to be very or fairly important, while 20.2% were neutral and 9.2% felt it was minimally important. Students from racial and ethnic minority groups were more likely to report feeling underrepresented compared to their white peers (p < .001). Additionally, students suggested improvements for integrating diversity, including the inclusion of more content on anatomical variations across populations that reflect local demographics. They also expressed a strong interest in learning about the historical context of human donor populations. Students proposed appointing a "diversity and inclusion student liaison" to facilitate feedback and assist faculty in promoting inclusivity.
conclusionsOutcomes demonstrate that most students favor a deliberate, broad inclusion of diverse anatomical content. These findings highlight the need to incorporate diverse anatomical content and cultural contexts into anatomy curricula, offering actionable recommendations for fostering a more inclusive and responsive learning environment in health professional education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.