ArticleThyroid research2025
CD44v6 expression in non-anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: characterization of candidates for targeted therapy.
Article in Thyroid research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCD44v6 is a membranous antigen upregulated in solid tumors and a promising molecular radiotherapy target, especially in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). A Phase 1 trial recently launched to evaluate the lutetium-labeled anti-CD44v6 antibody [ MATERIALS AND
methodsAn exploratory cohort of 33 tumors (30 papillary thyroid carcinomas [PTCs], 3 poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas [PDTCs]) was screened using the VFF-7 antibody, supported by detailed iodine concentration, genetic, and RNA sequencing data. A validation cohort of 40 oncocytic thyroid carcinomas (OTCs), 28 additional PDTCs, and one differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinoma was also screened using two antibody clones, VFF-7 and VFF-18.
resultsIn the exploratory cohort, 10 of 33 tumors (30%) showed focal or diffuse CD44v6 expression, while the rest were negative. Among OTCs in the validation cohort, 15 of 40 (38%) were partially or diffusely positive, and in PDTCs, 14 of 28 (50%) showed focal or diffuse staining. The VFF-7 and VFF-18 clones produced similar patterns.
conclusionsSubstantial subsets of non-ATCs express CD44v6, indicating that some patients may be candidates for [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.