Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039481›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Enhancing self-regulated learning: a comparison of medical students' self-assessment and faculty evaluations on communication skills in simulated patient interviews.

Hülya Akan, Hamza Yasin Delibaş, Serhat Koran, Pakize Yi̇ği̇t, Özlem Tanriöver

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hülya AkanDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. hulya.akan@medipol.edu.tr.
Hamza Yasin DelibaşFaculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serhat KoranDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pakize Yi̇ği̇tFaculty of Medicine, Biostatistics, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Özlem TanriöverDepartment of Medical Education, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-assessment enables medical students to gain an in-depth understanding of their own strengths and weaknesses, as part of their self-regulated learning which is an important factor for lifelong learning, and to set personal development. The aim of this study was to compare first year medical students’ self-evaluation of their performance in interviewing a simulated patient within the scope of communication skills training with the evaluation of trainers to give feedback as part of the training.

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional analytical study and included all first-year students of Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine. Two separate evaluation forms were prepared for educators and students by adapting already used ones. Students and educators completed the online version of the forms after the simulated patient interview. Descriptive statistics, Cohen’s Kappa coefficient to measure inter-rater reliability, correlation analysis and dependent sample t test were used to measure the agreement in Likert scale questions.

resultsAll first-year students in charge of the course, 193 students in total, participated in the study. Of the students participating in the study, 64.8% were female and 35.2% were male. In two-category questions, moderate agreement was observed in five questions and good agreement in two questions. No difference was observed between trainers and students in the overall global 10-point rating scale. In Likert-type questions, a moderate difference was observed between trainers and students in some questions. The self-assessment of male students was statistically higher than that of female students (p < 0.05).

conclusionsFirst-year medical students generally aligned with faculty evaluations in their overall communication skills, they tended to rate themselves more positively in certain sub-skills. Notably, male students demonstrated a more positive self-assessment compared to their female counterparts, whereas female students tended to assess themselves more realistically These results highlight the need for a more structured approach to self-evaluation in medical education, ensuring that all students develop accurate self-perception and receive targeted support to enhance their communication competencies.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunicationEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFaculty, MedicalPatient SimulationSelf-AssessmentStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLearningMaleTurkeyYoung AdultCommunication skillsSelf-assessmentSelf-Regulated learningTraining with simulated patient

Identifiers

PMID41039481
PMCPMC12492561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.