ArticleBMC medical education2025
Application of productive failure theory combined with debriefing teaching model in peripherally inserted central catheter skill training for oncology specialist nurses.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBased on the limitations of the traditional model of PICC skills training for domestic oncology specialist nurses in terms of curriculum design, training effect and clinical application, This study explored the application of the productive failure theory combined with debriefing in teaching peripherally inserted central catheter skills to oncology specialist nurses.
methodsThis quasi-experimental study was conducted in 2023 and involved 146 oncology nurses recruited from Sichuan Province. Participants were assigned to either the control group (n = 73) or the intervention group (n = 73) based on the principle of baseline comparability and convenience sampling. The control group received traditional teaching method, whereas the intervention group underwent a combined repeated teaching approach grounded in the theory of productive failure.
resultsBefore the training intervention, the demographic characteristics, professional theoretical knowledge, professional operation skills, learning motivation, clinical thinking ability, problem solving ability, self-efficacy, test scores and subjective evaluation in general information has no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05), which was comparable. After the intervention, the scores of the above five items and the teaching satisfaction of the intervention group were significantly higher than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
conclusionIn the skill teaching of central venous catheter through peripheral puncture, the teaching mode based on productive failure theory combined with debriefing teaching is obviously superior to the traditional teaching mode, which can significantly enhance the professional knowledge, skills, learning motivation, critical thinking, self-efficacy and other comprehensive qualities of oncology specialist nurses. It is worthy of being further incorporated into futher clinical content teaching research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.