ArticleBMC public health2025
Adopting the lens of the COM-B behaviour change model to qualitatively explore and understand public health implications of young adults' attitudes towards death-talk.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Death literacy as relational capability: Pathways from social capital to emotional support.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe topic of death and dying holds universal significance, yet societal norms often discourage open discussions, leading to a culture of death-denial. This reluctance can hinder informed decision-making, end-of-life planning, and access to adequate care and grief support. While research has examined death-talk among older adults, clinical populations and healthcare professionals, young adults' perspectives remain underexplored. Understanding their attitudes is crucial, as early engagement with death-talk - framed within a life-course approach - can foster emotional resilience and contribute to developing compassionate communities. This study aims to explore the perceptions and attitudes of a non-clinical sample of young adults (aged 18-34) towards discussing death and dying.
methodsA qualitative approach was employed, involving four focus groups with 33 young adults. Participants were selected using maximum variation sampling to ensure diversity in education, ethnicity, gender, and religious beliefs. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify themes related to attitudes toward death-talk, utilising a critical realist stance. Findings were mapped using the Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivations, and Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour change, to identify potentially modifiable barriers and facilitators to engaging in death-talk.
resultsThe analysis revealed four key themes which collectively illustrate the complex interplay between individual attitudes and broader cultural influences in shaping how young adults perceive and discuss death and dying. The themes highlighted how internal and external factors affect the ability and willingness of young adults to engage in meaningful discussions about death. Factors such as social stigma, fear of causing distress, and a lack of communication skills were identified as significant barriers. Conversely, the recognition of the importance of death-talk, personal experiences with bereavement, and a supportive social environment were found to facilitate these discussions.
conclusionsThis study provides valuable insights into the perceptions and experiences of death-talk amongst young adults, including barriers and facilitators. The findings suggest the need for targeted interventions to enhance death literacy among young people, emphasising the importance of normalising these conversations in everyday life. Recommendations are proposed for utilising these insights to inform public health strategies, education, and policy development aimed at fostering a more open dialogue about death and dying within the broader community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.