ArticleMalaria journal2025
Delivering an insecticide-treated net campaign in a complex operating environment: lessons from Anambra state, Nigeria.
Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaria is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in Nigeria. Distribution of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) is an important vector control strategy. In 2022, despite security challenges and COVID-19 restrictions, an ITN distribution was implemented in Anambra state. This paper describes the adaptations made to the ITN distribution campaign to ensure the safety of personnel, communities and property during implementation.
methodsFollowing national COVID-19 guidelines, the ITN campaign implemented a single-phase door-to-door distribution strategy. In May 2022, security risk categorization activity was carried out prior to the campaign to determine risk levels in each local government area (LGA) in the state. All LGAs and wards were classified into three risk categories as either high, medium or low. A set of adaptations were made to mitigate risk during the delivery of ITNs in high-risk locations. High risk LGAs were characterized by limited activities with comprehensive coordination involving both security agencies and existing community structures. The security situation in each LGA and ward was monitored during the campaign to ensure the correct set of actions were followed throughout.
resultsAfter conducting risk categorization, 11 out of the 21 LGAs in Anambra state were classified as high security risk. The adapted campaign strategy was implemented across all 11 LGAs. During the campaign 3,850,316 ITNs were delivered to 1,245,548 households across all 21 LGAs in the state. Engaging with community leaders and security agencies during the planning and implementation phases was critical for ensuring the safe delivery of ITNs to households in high-risk areas. Working with distributors from within the community and consistent use of communication technologies also helped to reduce the risk to personnel and supported the monitoring of the security situation and the progress of the distribution within each LGA.
conclusionDespite the insecurity in parts of Anambra state, ITNs were delivered to households in all LGAs. Engaging with existing community structures and appropriate use of technology can help to deliver malaria prevention interventions in security-compromised areas. The lessons from this campaign can help to inform and improve the strategies of future ITN distribution campaigns in complex operating environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.