SynthesisBMC medical education2025
Training in communication skills for healthcare providers in chronic care: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The VALUE of AI-Guided Communication: Enhancing Shared Decision-Making in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery Consultations Through a Metacognitive Framework.Obesity surgery · 2026Trial
- Delivering online communication skills training for radiation therapists.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Educational and Professional Development Interventions to Strengthen Empathy, Compassion, and Relational Care Among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Review
- Emotional Intelligence and Communication Skills in Healthcare University Students: The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Skills.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Evaluating the Impact of a Health Literacy Intervention on the Quality of Dietetic Communication in Outpatient Kidney Care.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026Article
- Communication Skills in Medical Education and Practice: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Current Research Landscape.Cureus · 2026Review
- Feedback and Debriefing in Healthcare Education to Improve Communication Skills: A Large Scoping Review.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentReview
- Implementing artificial intelligence (AI)-supported communication tools in healthcare: System-level perspectives.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCommunication skills training (CST) is essential for healthcare providers in chronic care, enabling patient-centered, empathetic, and effective interactions. This systematic review sought to identify evidence on the effectiveness, content, and teaching methods of CST programs for providers in chronic care. It aimed to identify universal principles and adaptable strategies that help improve communication skills across diverse chronic conditions.
methodsFive databases (Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to August 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating the impact of CST programs on healthcare providers in chronic care were included. Study selection was carried out independently by two authors, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer when needed. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.
resultsFifty-five studies (15 RCTs, 40 quasi-experimental) were included. Few interventions were developed with patient input (n = 4). Most interventions incorporated role-play with feedback (n = 46), didactics (n = 45), and group work (reflection and discussion) (n = 37), often used in combination. Common training foci included basic communication skills (n = 22), breaking bad news (n = 19), empathy (n = 17), and advance care planning (n = 14). Few interventions used booster training such as coaching, telephone, or email support (n = 8) or online/virtual modules (n = 8). Oncotalk and its adaptations were prevalent. CST programs demonstrated significant improvements in communication outcomes. Communication behaviors significantly improved in most studies (93%, 37/40), with similar improvements in communication self-efficacy and confidence (96%, 26/27), largely sustained at follow-ups. Positive shifts in attitudes and beliefs toward communication were also observed in most studies (80%, 8/10).
conclusionCST programs consistently improve providers' communication skills, self-efficacy, and attitudes. Their adaptability across chronic care contexts underscores their potential for broad implementation. However, standardized approaches and innovative delivery methods are needed to enhance scalability and long-term impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.