Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039423›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2025

Training in communication skills for healthcare providers in chronic care: a systematic review.

Maryam Peimani, Mozhgan Tanhapour, Melika Majlesi, Ensieh Nasli-Esfahani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Delivering online communication skills training for radiation therapists.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Evaluating the Impact of a Health Literacy Intervention on the Quality of Dietetic Communication in Outpatient Kidney Care.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maryam PeimaniDiabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. m_peimani@alumnus.tums.ac.ir.
Mozhgan TanhapourHealth Information Technology Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Urmia Medical Sciences University, Urmia, Iran.
Melika MajlesiDepartment of English Language Teaching, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Ensieh Nasli-EsfahaniEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCommunication skills training (CST) is essential for healthcare providers in chronic care, enabling patient-centered, empathetic, and effective interactions. This systematic review sought to identify evidence on the effectiveness, content, and teaching methods of CST programs for providers in chronic care. It aimed to identify universal principles and adaptable strategies that help improve communication skills across diverse chronic conditions.

methodsFive databases (Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to August 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating the impact of CST programs on healthcare providers in chronic care were included. Study selection was carried out independently by two authors, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer when needed. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.

resultsFifty-five studies (15 RCTs, 40 quasi-experimental) were included. Few interventions were developed with patient input (n = 4). Most interventions incorporated role-play with feedback (n = 46), didactics (n = 45), and group work (reflection and discussion) (n = 37), often used in combination. Common training foci included basic communication skills (n = 22), breaking bad news (n = 19), empathy (n = 17), and advance care planning (n = 14). Few interventions used booster training such as coaching, telephone, or email support (n = 8) or online/virtual modules (n = 8). Oncotalk and its adaptations were prevalent. CST programs demonstrated significant improvements in communication outcomes. Communication behaviors significantly improved in most studies (93%, 37/40), with similar improvements in communication self-efficacy and confidence (96%, 26/27), largely sustained at follow-ups. Positive shifts in attitudes and beliefs toward communication were also observed in most studies (80%, 8/10).

conclusionCST programs consistently improve providers' communication skills, self-efficacy, and attitudes. Their adaptability across chronic care contexts underscores their potential for broad implementation. However, standardized approaches and innovative delivery methods are needed to enhance scalability and long-term impact.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PersonnelChronic DiseaseClinical CompetenceHumansChronic careCommunicationSystematic reviewTraining

Identifiers

PMID41039423
PMCPMC12492962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.