ArticleBMC medical education2025
Enhancing pharmacology education through role-play: impact on student attitudes.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Medical versus science students: Knowledge, perceptions and learning of core pharmacology concepts.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- International Benchmarking of Pharmacology Curricula and Prescribing Related Learning Outcomes, Implications for Australian Health Professional Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluating Student Engagement and Effectiveness of the Scenario-Case Discussion Learning Model in Medical Microbiology Education.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacology is a cornerstone of medical education, essential for rational prescribing and patient safety. However, students often perceive it as abstract and overwhelming due to its memorization-heavy nature and limited clinical relevance. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a role-play-based clinical pharmacology internship on medical students' attitudes towards learning the pharmacology course.
methodsA mixed-methods interventional design was employed. In the quantitative phase, a one-group pretest-posttest design was used with 97 fifth-year medical students. Participants completed the "Attitude Scale Toward the Pharmacology Course for Medical School Students" before and after a one-week internship focused on rational drug use and structured around role-play activities. Paired sample t-tests were used to assess attitudinal change. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with eight students selected based on pre-post changes in attitude scores. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis.
resultsThere was a statistically significant improvement in students' attitudes following the role-play-based internship (pretest mean = 37.24, posttest mean = 41.15; p < .001), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 0.959). Qualitative findings revealed three major themes: (1) pharmacology as difficult but essential, (2) burden of memorization, and (3) the need for clinically relevant, functional learning. Students appreciated the realism and interactivity of role-play, which enhanced their understanding of drug interactions and rational prescribing. However, some still viewed pharmacology as anxiety-provoking and overly burdensome, indicating a need for longitudinal curricular integration.
conclusionsRole-play-based clinical pharmacology education significantly improves medical students' attitudes toward learning pharmacology. Embedding realistic, scenario-based learning within pharmacology curricula may enhance student engagement, promote rational prescribing, and contribute to safer clinical practice. This positive change was supported by a high effect size of Cohen's d = 0.96, demonstrating the significant educational impact of the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.