ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring health system resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden: an interrupted time series analysis of service utilisation and sociodemographic differences.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on surgical cancer care disparities according to socioeconomic status.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- The role of primary care data in multimorbidity estimates using administrative health data.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic strained health systems worldwide, diverting resources and disrupting routine healthcare services. These disruptions may lead to health risks from delayed or reduced care. Health system resilience (HSR) – a critical factor in maintaining health services during crises – refers to a system’s ability to anticipate, prepare for, absorb, respond to, recover from, and adapt to disruptions. To be effective, HSR must also be equitable, ensuring that all socioeconomic groups have access to healthcare services during crises. Sweden’s approach, which relied on public adherence to government recommendations rather than enforcing restrictions, presents a unique case for studying HSR.
aimThis study aims to evaluate aspects of HSR in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic by analysing changes in essential health service utilisation across different phases of the pandemic, and by examining sociodemographic differences in utilisation by education and sex.
methodThis study utilises interrupted time series analysis to evaluate changes in healthcare service utilisation across various levels of the Swedish health system with stratification by education and sex. Primary care was measured through diabetes diagnoses, emergency care through appendicitis cases, inpatient care through hospital admission for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and cancer diagnostics through diagnosis rates. Data were obtained from various population based Swedish health registries through the SWECOV project.
resultsThe findings highlight varying degrees of disruptions and resilience across different sectors. Emergency care, primary care, and symptom-based cancer diagnosis showed signs of recovery after an initial drop, whereas cancer screening, was more affected. In the case of inpatient care for IBD, the number of admissions declined, though the length of hospital stays remained unchanged. Education level did not impact healthcare utilisation for most indicators, and differences between men and women were generally small.
conclusionThe Swedish HSR during the COVID-19 pandemic was challenged but remained intact in most healthcare sectors. The health system on different levels also managed to a large degree cater for the diagnoses covered in this study, largely independent of educational level and sex. As data availability increases with time further research will help gain a deeper understanding of the outcomes of the pandemic on health services unrelated to COVID-19, including the role of education in influencing healthcare utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.