Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039399›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

A one-health approach to surveillance of tick-borne pathogens across different host groups.

Rachele Vada, Stefania Zanet, Anna Trisciuoglio, Amir Reza Varzandi, Andrea Calcagno, Ezio Ferroglio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachele VadaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095, Italy. rachele.vada@unito.it.
Stefania ZanetDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095, Italy.
Anna TrisciuoglioDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095, Italy.
Amir Reza VarzandiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095, Italy.
Andrea CalcagnoUnit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin at "Amedeo di Savoia Hospital", ASL "Città di Torino", Corso Svizzer 164, Torino, 10143, Italy.
Ezio FerroglioDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne pathogens are increasingly impacting wildlife and human populations' health due to expanded vector ranges and the growing popularity of outdoor activities. This study aimed to survey the prevalence of tick-borne zoonotic (TBZ) microorganisms in a rural area, targeting different host groups involved in their circulation, namely wildlife, domestic animals, humans and questing ticks, addressing the risk associated to hunting and outdoor leisure activities in an alpine environment. The study was performed in an alpine district in Northwestern Italy. We collected 124 pools of questing ticks using dragging transects across 38 locations distributed in the district. In addition, we obtained 133 spleen samples from game ungulate species (wild boar, red deer, and chamois), 67 blood samples from volunteer rural inhabitants, and samples from 38 privately-owned hunting dogs. All samples were tested by PCR for Babesia divergens/B. capreoli, B. microti-like, B. venatorum, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu latu, Rickettsiae Spotted Fever Group (SFG) and Anaplasma phagocytophilum. All investigated pathogens, except B. burgdorferi s.l. (found only in questing ticks), were detected in rural inhabitants. Babesia divergens/B. capreoli and B. venatorum were highly prevalent in wild ruminants, while B. microti-like organisms appeared sporadically in wild boar and dogs. SFG Rickettsiae were most common in dogs, with occasional cases in wild boar. Anaplasma phagocytophilum showed low prevalence in ticks and wildlife, but higher detection rates in humans and dogs. Our results underscore the interconnected nature of tick-host dynamics in the spread of TBZ and highlight the need for an expanded surveillance approach, potentially including other significant reservoirs.

Indexed as

One HealthTick-Borne DiseasesTicksAnaplasma phagocytophilumAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildBabesiaDeerDogsHumansItalyPrevalenceSus scrofaSwineZoonosesAcarological riskDomestic animalsHumansOne healthTick-borne diseasesWildlife

Identifiers

PMID41039399
PMCPMC12492514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.