Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039386›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2025

Impact of cut-point methods on classification of physical activity and sedentary behaviour of toddlers.

Jill Marie Ferry, Joaquin Escribano, Mariona Gispert-LLauradó, Berthold Koletzko, Veit Grote

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02907502 (Effects of Milk Protein Intake in Young Children on Early Growth and Later Obesity Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02907502 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Milk Protein Intake in Young Children on Early Growth and Later Obesity Risk: a Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSociété des Produits Nestlé (SPN)Ran2016 to 2024Enrolled1,618ConditionsHealthyArmsYoung-child formula with low protein content, Young-child formula with protein content similar to that of cow's milk
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jill Marie FerryDepartment of Paediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Joaquin EscribanoDepartment of Paediatrics, Nutrition and Development Research Unit, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, IISPV, Reus, Spain.
Mariona Gispert-LLauradóDepartment of Paediatrics, Nutrition and Development Research Unit, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, IISPV, Reus, Spain.
Berthold KoletzkoDepartment of Paediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Veit GroteDepartment of Paediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany. Veit.Grote@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClassification of physical activity (PA) depends on the cut-point method used to allocate PA counts from accelerometer measurements. This study investigates how three validated cut-point methods affect the time spent in various levels of PA and sedentary behaviour (SB), and how they impact toddlers estimated adherence to PA guidelines.

methodsPA was assessed using an ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometer in a cohort of 653 two-year-old children participating in the Toddler Milk Intervention study. Children wearing the ActiGraph for at least four days, with a minimum of six hours wear-time per day, were included. Time spent in SB and different activity levels were estimated according to three cut-point methods and were standardized to individual mean wear-time. We used one cut-point method based on the vertical axis (VA) (Trost VA), with an epoch length of 15 s and two cut-point methods based on either the VA (Costa VA) or on the vector magnitude (VM) (Costa VM) with an epoch length of five seconds. Estimates of SB and PA for each method were compared with repeated measures ANOVA.

resultsThe time toddlers spent in PA was significantly different depending on the cut-point methods. Costa VM classified on average 62 min (95% CI 61, 64] more per day as SB and 57 min (95% CI -58, -56] less per day as LPA compared to Trost VA (both p < 0.0001). For MVPA, the mean difference between Costa VA and Trost VA was 6.8 min (95% CI -7, -6; p < 0.0001). Concurrently, the proportion of children meeting the WHO recommendation of 180 min of total PA differed between cut-point methods, with 86% according to Costa VM and 97% according to Trost VA.

conclusionsThe time toddlers engage in different intensities of PA is significantly determined by the selection of cut-point method. Notably, the use of a different cut-point method leads up to a 10% difference in the estimated time spent in LPA and SB, but only a 1% difference of moderate-vigorous PA. These differences change the estimated adherence to recommendations. Future research is needed to standardize the data processing methods for better comparability between studies analysing toddlers' PA. REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT02907502, Registration Date: 31 August 2016.

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseSedentary BehaviorChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleAccelerometerActiGraphCut-pointsPhysical activitySedentary behaviourToddlers

Identifiers

PMID41039386
PMCPMC12492789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.