ArticleBMC medical education2025
Integrating medical humanities in undergraduate medical education: a curricular model aligned with the InspirE5 framework.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of integrating body and organ donation education into anatomy teaching on medical students' concepts of respect for life: a mixed-methods cluster randomized trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Evaluating a corpus-based intervention in medical English writing: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Perceived value, structural barriers, and academic burnout under the "hard science vs. soft skills" paradox: a cross-sectional study among Chinese medical students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical Humanities (MH) integrate the human sciences, arts and social sciences into medical education to foster empathy, ethical reflection and critical thinking. This article presents the MH programme at Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), framed within the InspirE5 model-an internationally informed framework for designing and evaluating health humanities curricula.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative descriptive-interpretive study using document analysis and triangulated phenomenological interpretation. A multidisciplinary team analysed the programme according to the five domains of the InspirE5 model: Environment, Expectations, Experiences, Evidence, and Enhancement.
resultsThe UFV MH programme aligns closely with the InspirE5 capabilities, integrating them into a longitudinal, compulsory curriculum. It includes diverse pedagogical methods-such as mentoring, experiential learning, reflective writing, and interdisciplinary seminars-fostering person-centredness, ambiguity tolerance, and ethical imagination.
conclusionsThe programme demonstrates a coherent integration of MH across six academic years and provides a model of transformative, transdisciplinary education. Its alignment with the InspirE5 framework strengthens its value as a paradigm for medical humanities development, assessment and international comparison.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.