ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Rates of adherence, adherence measurement, and support services for children and adolescents living with HIV followed in global sites of the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA).
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSupporting and improving antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence and preventing the evolution of HIV drug resistance remain major challenges for children and adolescents living with HIV globally. In a large global HIV clinical data consortium, we sought to describe how global HIV care programs measure and support pediatric ART adherence, as well as patient-level measures of adherence.
methodsWe prospectively collected site-level data between June 2014-March 2015 using a site assessment survey and retrospectively examined patient-level data collected during routine clinical care, to provide a comprehensive assessment of pediatric ART adherence across the International Epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) cohort, in six global regions. All regions capturing patient-level data on adherence by any measure for children living with HIV aged less than 14 years between 2000-2015 were asked to contribute data. ART adherence was conceptualized as a binomial variable of "good" (greater than 90%) or "poor" (90% or less) adherence per visit.
resultsClinical staff from 180 pediatric sites in 45 countries completed the adherence survey. Clinician adherence assessment (used at 87% of sites) and pharmacy refills (86% of sites) were the most common adherence measurement methods used globally. Counseling focused on adherence was the most commonly available support service, (94% of sites). 28,664 pediatric patients had at least one adherence measurement, to be included for adherence analyses. In East Africa and Southern Africa, higher baseline CD4 counts were associated with a greater likelihood of viral suppression; however, in Central and South America and the Caribbean (CCASAnet) and Asia-Pacific, we did not find a consistent relationship between baseline CD4 count and the likelihood of viral suppression. We found evidence that very young children (< 2 years of age), older children (> 10 years of age), and males were less likely to experience viral suppression in East Africa and Southern Africa.
conclusionThese findings indicate that the majority of global pediatric HIV care services routinely measure ART adherence for children living with HIV; however, few sites use objective or validated measures. Identifying subgroups of children and youth at highest risk for non-adherence allows care programs to target those most in need of adherence support or resistance monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.