Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039247›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Statistically principled feature selection for single cell transcriptomics.

Emmanuel P Dollinger, Kai Silkwood, Scott Atwood, Qing Nie, Arthur D Lander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Leveraging gene correlations in single cell transcriptomic data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emmanuel P DollingerCenter for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Kai SilkwoodCenter for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Scott AtwoodCenter for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Qing NieCenter for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Arthur D LanderCenter for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. adlander@uci.edu.

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Christine Hui · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Shared Resource Core: Single Cell AnalysisU54CA217378 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LOWENGRUB, JOHN · 2018 to 2022
$9.7M
Understanding critical transitions in chronic myeloid leukemia to improve tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapyP01CA288662 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Arthur D Lander, Devon A. Lawson · 2025 to 2026
$6.4M
UCI P30 Skin Center Systems Biology CoreP30AR075047 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LANDER, ARTHUR D · 2019 to 2025
$5.1M
Mentor Training to enhance mentorship in an interdisciplinary training programT32GM136624 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Arthur D Lander, Qing Nie · 2020 to 2026
$3.1M
Development of tools for analyzing cell-cell communication using spatial transcriptomic dataR01GM152494 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Zixuan Cang, Qing Nie · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA288662NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217378NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR075047NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM152494NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136624NIH HHS P30AR075047NIH HHS T32GM136624NIH HHS U54CA217378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high dimensionality of data in single cell transcriptomics (scRNAseq) requires investigators to choose subsets of genes ("feature selection") for downstream analysis (e.g., unsupervised cell clustering). The evaluation of different approaches to feature selection is hampered by the fact that, as we show here, the difficulty of feature selection can vary greatly, depending on the dataset being analyzed.

resultsFor routine cell type identification, even randomly chosen features can perform well, but for cell type differences that are subtle, both number of features and selection strategy matter strongly. We present a simple feature selection method grounded in an analytical model that allows for interpretable delineation of how many and which features to choose, facilitating identification of biologically meaningful rare cell types. We compare this method to default methods in scanpy and Seurat, as well as SCTransform, showing how greater accuracy can often be achieved with surprisingly few, well-chosen features.

conclusionsFeature selection is a critical step in scRNAseq for downstream analyses. We explore the pitfalls that can arise from incautious feature selection and present a statistical method to facilitate improved outcomes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomeAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansSequence Analysis, RNACell stateCell typeClusteringFano factorFeature selectionRare cell identificationSingle cell transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID41039247
PMCPMC12490061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.