Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039225›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2025

Bacterial community dynamics in spontaneously fermented Ghanaian cereals, legumes, root, tuber and plantain flours.

Richard Atinpoore Atuna, Fortune Akabanda, Stefan Bletz, Natalie Scherff, Jan Makurat, Ursula Bordewick-Dell, Matthias Lamping, Guido Ritter, Alexander Mellmann, Francis Kweku Amagloh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Lactic acid bacterial strains isolated fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Richard Atinpoore AtunaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana. ratuna@uds.edu.gh.
Fortune AkabandaDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.
Stefan BletzInstitute of Hygiene, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Natalie ScherffInstitute of Hygiene, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Jan MakuratDepartment of Food-Nutrition-Facilities, Muenster University of Applied Sciences, Muenster, Germany.
Ursula Bordewick-DellDepartment of Food-Nutrition-Facilities, Muenster University of Applied Sciences, Muenster, Germany.
Matthias LampingDepartment of Food-Nutrition-Facilities, Muenster University of Applied Sciences, Muenster, Germany.
Guido RitterDepartment of Food-Nutrition-Facilities, Muenster University of Applied Sciences, Muenster, Germany.
Alexander MellmannInstitute of Hygiene, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Francis Kweku AmaglohDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.

Funding

This study was supported by a scholarship awarded to Richard Atinpoore Atuna through the DAAD program for Bi-nationally Supervised Doctoral Degrees 2024/25 57693451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous fermentation is among the oldest food preservation methods, with evidence of enhancing the nutritional and sensorial qualities of products and the synthesis of health-promoting compounds. However, the bacterial communities responsible for these transformative changes remain poorly understood, notably across diverse indigenous Ghanaian substrates, including grains and starchy roots, tubers, and plantains.

methodThe study aimed to examine bacterial community diversity in the spontaneous fermentations of selected Ghanaian raw materials for complementary food, namely maize, millet, sorghum, sweetpotato, cassava, soybean and plantain. Fermentation lasted 48 h, with samples collected at 6-h intervals. The pH and total titratable acidity (TTA) were determined using standard protocols over the fermentation period. DNA was extracted directly from the fermented food samples using ZymoBIOMICS™ kits, and full-length 16 S rDNA sequencing was performed on the Pacific Biosciences Sequel IIe long-read sequencing platform. Data processing involved DADA2 and taxonomic classification against the SILVA database v138.1, with analysis conducted using R version 4.4.3.

resultsFermented cereals exhibited increasing bacterial diversity over time, dominated by Weissella confusa, Enterococcus hirae, and Pediococcus acidilactici. Soybean fermentation showed distinct microbial communities with fluctuating diversity. Starch-rich roots, tubers, and plantain supported the growth of Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Weissella confusa, Gluconobacter frateurii, Fructobacillus fructosus, and Pediococcus pentosaceus. Enterococcus faecium favored acidic conditions, while Weissella confusa and Leuconostoc mesenteroides adapted to the fluctuating pH conditions in specific crop substrates.

conclusionThe fermented flours showed increased bacterial diversity over time, dominated by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and acetic acid bacteria. The fermentation patterns among the plant-based substrates differed in terms of bacterial behavior and their response to pH and TTA over time. Understanding the bacterial community dynamics not only enhances our knowledge of bacterial ecosystems but also offers a foundation for refining the safety, consistency, and nutritional quality of fermented foods.

Indexed as

BacteriaEdible GrainFabaceaeFermented FoodsFlourMicrobiotaDNA, BacterialFermentationFood MicrobiologyGhanaHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPlant RootsPlant TubersRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rDNA sequencingBacterial diversityGhanaian substratesRelative abundanceSpontaneous fermentation

Identifiers

PMID41039225
PMCPMC12492965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.