ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Marine vs. freshwater cyanobacteria as biostimulants for wheat under salt stress: morphophysiological, anatomical and phytochemical perspectives.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the biostimulant activity of eco-extracts from soil-isolated cyanobacteria in sustainable wheat cropping under greenhouse conditions.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Novel halotolerant fungal endophytes from hypersaline coastal ecosystems as sustainable biostimulants for early growth performance of tomato and wheat under saline stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Natural biostimulant formulations enriched with honey, iodine, and silymarin enhance drought tolerance and yield in faba bean (Vicia Faba L.) through antioxidant and hormonal regulation.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salinity is a major abiotic stress that restricts global crop productivity, particularly in staple cereals such as wheat (Triticum aestivum). This study investigates the biostimulant potential of two cyanobacterial strains, Alkalinema pantanalense (freshwater origin) and Geminocystis sp. (marine origin), on the early growth of three wheat genotypes under varying salt stress conditions (0, 50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl). Algal extracts were applied to seeds and seedlings, and physiological, anatomical, and biochemical responses were assessed. Results revealed that A. pantanalense significantly improved seed germination and chlorophyll content under moderate salinity (50-100 mM), especially in genotype G2, with shoot length reaching up to 3.5 cm and chlorophyll levels maintained near control values. In contrast, Geminocystis sp. enhanced root dry weight even under high salinity (200 mM), suggesting improved osmotic adjustment, though it reduced root length and meristem size in some genotypes. Anatomical analysis revealed that A. pantanalense increased the number of root meristem cells and promoted vascular differentiation, thereby supporting structural resilience. Phytochemical profiling revealed that A. pantanalense was richer in flavonoids (130.7 µg/g naringin) and phenolic acids (ferulic and caffeic), while Geminocystis sp. had higher phytohormone levels, notably IAA (20.95 µg/g ) and BA. GC-MS analysis identified bioactive compounds such as lupeol and oleic acid in A. pantanalense, and phytol and methyl esters in Geminocystis sp. These findings demonstrate distinct yet complementary biostimulant profiles between the two cyanobacteria, underscoring their potential for sustainable wheat cultivation in saline soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.