SynthesisThe journal of headache and pain2025
Application of machine learning in migraine classification: a call for study design standardization and global collaboration.
Synthesis in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An AI-based nomogram (the CGRP score) for the prediction of response to modern migraine therapies: an independent assessment and some considerations on the application of AI tools in clinical setting.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Triggers, prodrome, aura, and headache interactions in migraine with typical aura: a prospective deep-phenotyping study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Observational
- Central executive network-related neuromagnetic abnormalities in chronic and episodic migraine: a resting-state magnetoencephalography study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- The potential application of electrophysiological indicators in TMS treatment for MOH.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Concentration monitoring and dose optimization for infliximab in Crohn's disease patients: a machine learning-based covariate ensemble model.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine is a complex neurological disorder with diverse clinical phenotypes and a multifaceted pathophysiology, which poses substantial challenges for accurate diagnosis, subtype differentiation, and biomarker discovery. Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as promising tools for classifying migraine patients and uncovering the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that differentiate migraine types and subtypes. This systematic review identifies current ML classification models for migraine types and subtypes, evaluating the quality, reproducibility, and clinical utility of published studies. The findings demonstrate that current ML models, particularly support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis, can accurately classify migraine patients based on structural and functional neuroimaging features with accuracies ranging from 75 to 98%. However, quality assessment revealed significant methodological heterogeneity across studies, including inconsistent reporting of model performance, insufficient patient phenotyping, small and imbalanced datasets, and limited external validation. These limitations hinder the global generalizability and reproducibility of these studies. We propose a roadmap for future research emphasizing well-characterized clinical subgrouping, standardized data acquisition and feature engineering protocols, transparency in model development and reporting, and collaborative multicentric designs to enable large-scale validation. Furthermore, this review stresses the importance of incorporating real-world phenotypic data, such as treatment response, comorbidities, and digital phenotyping metrics, to enrich ML models and support the transition toward precision medicine in migraine care. Ultimately, this review highlights the urgent need for methodological rigor in migraine ML classification studies to bridge the gap between experimental success and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.