Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039195›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of headache and pain2025

Application of machine learning in migraine classification: a call for study design standardization and global collaboration.

Igor Petrušić, Roberta Messina, Lanfranco Pellesi, David Garcia Azorin, Chia-Chun Chiang, Adriana Della Pietra, Woo-Seok Ha, Alejandro Labastida-Ramirez, Dilara Onan, Raffaele Ornello and 10 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. The potential application of electrophysiological indicators in TMS treatment for MOH.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Igor PetrušićLaboratory for Advanced Analysis of Neuroimages, Faculty of Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, 12-16 Studentski Trg Street, Belgrade, 11000, Serbia. ip7med@yahoo.com.
Roberta MessinaNeurology Unit and Neuroimaging Research Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Lanfranco PellesiClinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
David Garcia AzorinDepartment of Medicine, Toxicology and Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Chia-Chun ChiangDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Adriana Della PietraDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Woo-Seok HaDepartment of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Alejandro Labastida-RamirezDivision of Neuroscience, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9LT, UK.
Dilara OnanDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye.
Raffaele OrnelloDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Bianca RaffaelliDepartment of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eloisa Rubio-BeltranHeadache Group. Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ruth RuscheweyhDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claudio TanaInternal Medicine Unit, Eastern Hospital, ASL Taranto, Taranto, TA, Italy.
Doga VuralliDepartment of Neurology and Algology, Neuropsychiatry Center, Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Center of Excellence (NÖROM), Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Marta Waliszewska-ProsółDepartment of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Wei WangHeadache Center, Department of Neurology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
William David Wells-GatnikTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Paolo MartellettiSchool of Health, Unitelma Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Alberto RaggiPublic Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Neurology, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is a complex neurological disorder with diverse clinical phenotypes and a multifaceted pathophysiology, which poses substantial challenges for accurate diagnosis, subtype differentiation, and biomarker discovery. Machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as promising tools for classifying migraine patients and uncovering the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that differentiate migraine types and subtypes. This systematic review identifies current ML classification models for migraine types and subtypes, evaluating the quality, reproducibility, and clinical utility of published studies. The findings demonstrate that current ML models, particularly support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis, can accurately classify migraine patients based on structural and functional neuroimaging features with accuracies ranging from 75 to 98%. However, quality assessment revealed significant methodological heterogeneity across studies, including inconsistent reporting of model performance, insufficient patient phenotyping, small and imbalanced datasets, and limited external validation. These limitations hinder the global generalizability and reproducibility of these studies. We propose a roadmap for future research emphasizing well-characterized clinical subgrouping, standardized data acquisition and feature engineering protocols, transparency in model development and reporting, and collaborative multicentric designs to enable large-scale validation. Furthermore, this review stresses the importance of incorporating real-world phenotypic data, such as treatment response, comorbidities, and digital phenotyping metrics, to enrich ML models and support the transition toward precision medicine in migraine care. Ultimately, this review highlights the urgent need for methodological rigor in migraine ML classification studies to bridge the gap between experimental success and clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMigraine DisordersResearch DesignHumansNeuroimagingArtificial intelligenceClassification algorithmsDeep learningMigraine typesNeuroimagingSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID41039195
PMCPMC12492770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.