SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2025
Risk Factors for Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Fistulas After Craniotomy and Craniectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPostoperative CSF fistulas are a common complication in cranial neurosurgery. While efforts to prevent CSF leaks typically focus on surgical technique, it remains unclear whether tumor location, type of pathology, or specific closure methods independently influence fistula development. Clarifying these risk factors is essential to guide intraoperative decision-making and improve patient outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search limited to peer-reviewed studies published in English on multiple databases. The search algorithm retrieved 1,348 results. After the exclusion phase, we included 26 comparative studies in the final analysis, collectively reporting data on 8,248 patients who underwent either craniotomy or craniectomy. After a systematic review, we performed a meta-analysis when sufficient data were available from multiple studies for a specific risk factor.
resultsInfratentorial surgeries had a higher CSF leak rate (7.9%) than supratentorial ones (4.6%). Tumor surgeries showed greater risk than vascular procedures (OR: 1.82). Primary closure had a higher leak rate (12.3%) compared to patch grafts (8.5%). Watertight closure showed a trend toward fewer leaks than non-watertight closure, though not statistically significant. CSF leaks were strongly associated with postoperative infections (34.1%).
conclusionInfratentorial location, tumor surgery, and sural closure increase the risk of postoperative CSF leaks. Patch grafts and watertight techniques lower this risk. Given the strong association with infections, preventing CSF leaks is essential to improve surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.