ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Brain age as an accurate biomarker of preclinical cognitive decline: evidence from a 12-year longitudinal study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of neuroimaging signatures of aging and Alzheimer's with fluid biomarkers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- A comparative evaluation of brain MRI modalities, modality-specific measures, brain regions, and cognitive tests for brain age prediction.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Explainable Machine Learning Reveals Time-Dependent Cognitive Risk in Minor Neurocognitive Disorder: Implications for Health Promotion and Early Risk Stratification.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- NeuroFM: Toward Precision Neuroimaging with Foundation Models for Individualized Brain Health Estimation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A discovery protein panel for brain predicted age discordance using MRI in neurologically healthy individuals.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive decline in older adults, particularly during the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), presents a critical opportunity for early detection and intervention. While T1-weighted MRI is widely used in AD research, its capacity to identify early vulnerability and monitor longitudinal progression remains incompletely characterized. We analyzed longitudinal T1-weighted MRI data from 224 cognitively unimpaired older adults followed for up to 12 years. Participants were stratified by clinical outcome into converters to mild cognitive impairment (HC-converters, n = 112) and stable controls (HC-stable, n = 112). Groups were matched at baseline for age (mean ~ 74-75 years), education (~ 16.4 years), and cognitive scores (MMSE ≈ 29; CDR-SB ≈ 0.04). Four MRI-derived biomarkers were examined: brain-predicted age difference (brain-PAD), mean cortical thickness, AD-cortical signature, and hippocampal volume. Brain-PAD showed the strongest baseline association with future conversion (β = 1.25, t = 3.52, p = 0.0009) and highest classification accuracy (AUC = 0.66; sensitivity = 62%, and specificity = 67%). Longitudinal mixed-effects models focusing on the group × time interaction revealed a significant positive slope in brain-PAD for converters (β = 0.0079, p = 0.003) and a non-significant trend in stable controls (β = 0.0047, p = 0.075), indicating incipient divergence in brain aging trajectories during the preclinical window. Hippocampal volume and AD-cortical signature declined similarly in both groups. The mean cortical thickness had limited discriminative or dynamic utility. These findings support brain-PAD, derived from routine T1-weighted MRI using machine learning, as a sensitive, performance-independent biomarker for early risk stratification and monitoring of cognitive aging trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41039123What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.