ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Comparison of Different Bipolar Construct Configurations for the Correction of Adult Spine Deformity: A Finite Element Analysis.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Clinical Feasibility of a Computer-Assisted Shape Design and Bending System for Spinal Fixation Rods.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA minimally invasive bipolar spinal fixation was recently developed to correct the deformity in pediatric neuromuscular scoliosis and has recently been adapted for adult scoliosis. Although the clinical results are promising, mechanical complications are still not negligible. In this work, alternative configurations of bipolar constructs were compared through numerical simulation, in order to evaluate stress distribution along the implant according to each configuration.
methodsThe configurations included doubling the rods, adding lumbar screws to strengthen the distal anchorage, and combining two different materials (titanium and chromium-cobalt alloy). This resulted in seven different configurations, which were implemented in a subject-specific and experimentally validated finite element model, based on the geometry of an asymptomatic subject. Von Mises stresses were compared between configurations.
resultsThe results confirm that doubling the rods reduced mid-rod stresses, as expected, but also shifted some of the load from the distal anchorage to the rods, which is a common site of implant failure. The addition of pedicle screws also reduced the stress in the distal anchorage. The configuration showing the best compromise between stress reduction and the mini-invasive character of surgery included a doubling of both rods in titanium.
conclusionsThese results should be confirmed by clinical results, but they already provide clear guidelines for the surgeon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41039097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.