Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039057›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of the protective efficacy of a user seal check for N95 respirators through quantitative fit testing in an ambulance crew.

Hitoshi Sawada, Miyuki Kakine, Yoshie Kubota, Kazuhiro Sekine, Atsushi Hiraide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hitoshi SawadaDepartment of Emergency Medical Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Japan.
Miyuki KakineDepartment of Nursing, Katsuragi Hospital, Kishiwada, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshie KubotaDepartment of Emergency Medical Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazuhiro SekineDepartment of Emergency Medical Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Japan.
Atsushi HiraideDepartment of Emergency Medical Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Japan. hpgm00160@yahoo.co.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ensure health and wellbeing of healthcare workers, prevention of infection is essential. Although N95 filtering facepiece respirators (N95 respirators) are potentially effective respiratory protective devices, scientific evaluation for healthcare workers, particularly for ambulance crews has been insufficient. We investigated if N95 respirator user seal checking ensures seal quality through quantitative fit testing among ambulance crews. A user seal check was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and based on each participant's subjective assessment of fit. A quantitative test was then performed using a dedicated counter. In the results, although the pass rates for both the user seal check and the quantitative test exceeded 50%, the kappa coefficients between the two tests were -0.072 (95%CI: -0.38-0.23), 0.11 (95%CI: -0.11-0.33), and 0.013 (95%CI: -0.31-0.34) for three kinds of N95 respirators respectively suggesting extremely low rates of agreement similar to other reports from health providers. Therefore, we compared the patterns of distributions of the two tests. In the result, probability of agreement of the two tests was determined to be 50%, which was identical to a coin toss. It is unknown what level of protection an N95 respirator will provide when only a user seal check is performed.

Indexed as

AmbulancesCOVID-19Health PersonnelN95 RespiratorsOccupational ExposureRespiratory Protective DevicesHumansMaterials TestingEmergency medical techniciansEmergency medicineInfection controlN95 respirators

Identifiers

PMID41039057
PMCPMC12491425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.