ArticleScientific reports2025
Competitive adsorption of pharmaceuticals and dissolved organic matter from hospital effluent on amine-functionalized periodic mesoporous organosilicas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Removal of SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals from Aqueous Media Using Bioaugmented Activated Sludge.Toxics · 2026Article
- Contrast Agents for Enhanced Bioimaging: A Comprehensive Review.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The competitive adsorption of clofibric acid (CFA) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) on amine-organosilane-modified periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMOs) along with the coexistence of actual complex of dissolved organic matter (DOM) were systematically investigated. The effects of amine-silane units (1N-, 2N-, and 3N-silane) and the molar loading ratios of amine-silane units (10%, 25%, and 40% of organosilica precursor) were evaluated. 3 N-Silane's loading rate at 40% provided the highest amine group density and [Formula: see text], resulting in the highest adsorption performance of CFA and SMX. Adsorption rate and capacity of CFA were better than those of SMX, which closely correlated with the hydrogen bonding, attractive electrostatic interaction, and hydrophobic partitioning corresponding to the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] values of the adsorbates. Compared to SMX, CFA's adsorption onto 40% and 3N-magnetized PMO performed higher competitive adsorption, and solution pH had a lower effect on it. Hydrophilic-like DOM may interact with CFA and SMX only in the aqueous phase, resulting in adsorption reduction in a mixed-solute solution. Interestingly, hydrophobic-like DOM can be co-adsorbed and promote the adsorption of SMX in a mixed-solute solution through multilayer adsorption. While coexisting with the actual mixed DOM complex, the competitive adsorption capacity of CFA was reduced and that of SMX increased. However, a reduction in the CFA adsorption capacity of 3 N-magnetized PMO after regeneration by ethanal extraction was detected due to the collapse of the organosilica structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.