ArticleScientific reports2025
An integrated TOPSIS and ARAS method multi-criteria decision-making approach for optimizing investment portfolios using goal programming and genetic algorithm model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the portfolio optimization field grows, classical techniques often notoriously find it difficult to efficiently model how investors decisions, risk tolerances, and asset attributes intertwine. This paper presents an innovation-based hybrid method, where Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) combined with Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) for multi-criteria decision making, Goal Programming (GP) and a Genetic Algorithm (GA) for finding constraints are united. The proposed approach enhances the accuracy of ranking and effectiveness of allocation by incorporating asset evaluation, characterization of investors and probabilistic construction of portfolios. The system is tested in view of various performance implications, using the FAR-Trans dataset, a collection of genuine transaction statistics and asset pricing, as well as investor data. The first step involves project transaction capacities partitioning and risk categorization to create a bipartite TOPSIS-ARAS scoring mechanism. The GP part of the model matches investment decisions to the individual return and risk expectations of each investor, and the GA promotes the use of entropy-aware strategies. Important performance metrics are a Sharpe Ratio of 2.241, the annualized return of 4.6% and diversification score of 0.845. The study also reflects a 0.729 correlation between TOPSIS-ARAS rankings, and GP configurations leading to portfolio returns of over 30.0%. The system offers a realistic depiction of the behavior of investors, considering several transaction channels and different risk factors as well as geographies. The comprehensive integration is very flexible, computationally effective and based on realistic investment models while minimizing constraint deviation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.