ArticleScientific reports2025
Volcanic scoria as a sustainable alternative to sand in structural lightweight concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the potential of using scoria, a lightweight volcanic aggregate, as a sustainable replacement for natural sand in the production of structural lightweight concrete, addressing the challenges posed by sand scarcity in Ethiopia. The concrete mixtures were proportioned to achieve a minimum compressive strength of 25 MPa, with natural sand partially or fully replaced by scoria at volumetric substitution levels of 35%, 50%, 70%, and 100%. Key concrete properties were assessed at curing ages of 7, 28, and 56 days. The experimental program included slump, compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, water penetration, and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) tests. The 35% replacement mix achieved the highest compressive strength at 43.6 MPa, surpassing the control sample (39.6 MPa), while the 50% replacement yielded optimal flexural (4.88 MPa) and tensile strengths (3.36 MPa). Workability decreased with increasing scoria content, and densities dropped from 2405 kg/m³ (control) to 2164 kg/m³ (100% scoria). Scoria's microstructural properties, observed via SEM and XRD, confirmed its glassy, porous structure, contributing to enhanced water resistance, with penetration depths decreasing to 20 mm at 35% scoria replacement. These findings suggest that scoria, at optimal levels, can improve concrete's mechanical and durability properties, offering a viable, eco-friendly sand alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.