ArticleBritish journal of cancer2025
A nomogram based on autoantibodies for noninvasive detection of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heat Shock Proteins as Cancer Biomarkers: From Mechanism to Clinical Application.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of IVF/ICSI outcomes in male factor infertility highlighting couple-level BMI.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosing AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging. Autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens have been extensively investigated as serum biomarkers.
methodsWe employed serological proteome analysis and protein microarray to identify potential autoantibodies for HCC, followed by a two-center and two-independent-phase validation and evaluation using ELISA in patients with AFP-negative HCC (ANHCC). LASSO regression addressed multicollinearity among biomarkers. Four machine-learning methods developed diagnostic models for ANHCC. ROC analysis and various evaluation indicators were applied to assess the performance.
resultsEight autoantibodies out of sixteen candidates, including Survivin, NPM1, GNAS, SRSF2, GNA11, PTCH1, GAPDH, and HSP90, were validated as superior biomarkers. The Logistic regression model was optimal for ANHCC, achieving an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.883 in the training dataset and an AUC of 0.840 in the validation dataset. When tested on the entire HCC patient cohort, which included both ANHCC and AFP-positive patients (APHCC), with ANHCC accounting for 37.5%, the AUC reached 0.825, with a sensitivity of 66.4%, and a specificity of 84.2%. Combining this model with AFP improved efficacy, yielding an AUC of 0.945, an IDI of 23.1%, and an NRI of 21.1% compared to using AFP alone.
conclusionThe Logistic regression model demonstrates superior diagnostic performance for ANHCC. Integrating this model with AFP enhances the entire HCC diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.